Today we’re kicking off a new regular feature here on the blog: an interview series with thought-leaders from around the open geo world. The rise of mobile and particularly smart phones means that most of us now carry around a device with us that knows more or less where we are at all times. This data opens amazing new possibilities, but also many new technical and cultural challenges. The implications will probably take a generation or two for humanity to fully digest - this is a technical shift as profound as the electrification. We hope that by highlighting different voices from all parts of the open geo community we can help stimulate the discussion and push forward the cause of open geo data. We hope to publish a new interview every few weeks. Please feel free to get in touch and let us know who you’d like us to interview going forward.
Kevin, thanks for taking the time to speak with us.
1. What got you into the open geo scene?
As a former satellite imagery analyst , I became interested in the open geo community as soon as I became aware of the community. As a former satellite imagery analyst I was interested in its potential. As a lawyer and the founder and Executive Director of the Centre for Spatial Law and Policy I was intrigued by the legal issues.
2. What is the Centre for Spatial Law and Policy?
The Centre is a non-profit organization with a mission to raise awareness of the legal and policy issues that impact the collection/use/storage/distribution of geoinformation. The legal communities tend to be reactive, and as a result, it has not kept pace the rapid advancements of geospatial technology and the applications that use geoinformation. As a result, the legal and geospatial communities are struggling to adapt existing laws and policies to the emerging “location-enabled” society. The Centre is trying to raise awareness of these issues and their impact.
3. There’s been some discussion recently on whether the OSM’s license, specifically it’s share-alike property, hurts or helps adoption of OpenStreetMap. What do you think?
The share-alike provision in the Open Database License (ODbL) is a condition. Like any other licensing condition, it limits the use of the licensed material, in this case OSM data.
4. One of the big challenges facing the OSM community is that it is literally a global community, so you have not just many different opinions, but also different legal cultures, perspectives, norms, ways of working, jurisdictions, etc. Given that context, and the pain of the past license change, is it possible for OSM to stay flexible and adapt it’s legal framework over time, or are we destined to keep the status quo?</span></span>
I would like to believe that an organization that was created to challenge the status quo can create a governance structure that can be flexible enough to adapt to the fast changing geospatial community. However it is not going to be easy.
Many thanks Kevin for being our first interviewee. We look forward to many more.